Doyle received many love letters addressed to Sherlock
Holmes as well as letters offering their services as a landlady. Even back in Victorian times, Sherlock Holmes
was considered sexy.
Back in 1886, a struggling doctor in England was
trying to get his first novel published.
It would be rejected by many prestigious publishing houses for many
reasons, including that it wasn’t sellable because it lacked romance. The novel was A Study in Scarlet. The
author was Arthur Conan Doyle and the unromantic character was Sherlock Holmes.
Over 125 years later, Sherlock Holmes still attracts
thousands of fans, including women who include the Great Detective in their fan
fiction, dreams and sentimental YouTube music videos. This is not a new phenomenon. Doyle received many love letters addressed to
Sherlock Holmes as well as letters offering their services as a landlady. Even back in Victorian times, Sherlock Holmes
was considered sexy.
Descriptions
and Drawings
Doyle never once claimed that Holmes was a handsome
man. He rarely described Holmes’
appearance in anything close to complimentary terms. Holmes was tall, but seemed taller because he
was so thin. He had gray eyes, dark,
thinning hair and a “hawk-like” nose. It
was the illustrator Sidney Paget who first gave Holmes shape. He based Holmes on himself and his brother
Walter. Doyle claimed that these
drawings made Holmes too handsome.
There are other qualities that people can find extremely
attractive rather than good looks.
Holmes is a genius. He can play
the violin. He is a success in his
peculiar trade. He sometimes takes the
law into his own hands, but always with good reasons. He is a self-made gentleman instead of one
born in the upper classes who is (almost) always in command of a
situation. He also has very dark shadowy
side that can be very appealing. He is a
magnetic personality partially because he keeps most of himself hidden away
from others – even Watson.
Actor
Portrayals
One obvious reason that Sherlock Holmes stars in many
women’s fantasies is due to the more than 150 actors who have portrayed him on
stage and screen. Arguably the current
popularity of BBC’s Sherlock is based
more for Benedict Cumberbatch than for bringing the Great Detective to the 21st
century. Over the decades, actors who
have portrayed Sherlock Holmes have generally been more and more conventionally
handsome, including John Barrymore, Jeremy Brett and Robert Downey, Jr.
The first major actor to portray Holmes was the square-jawed
American William Gillette. In 1899, he
collaborated with Doyle to write a four act play called “Sherlock Holmes.” In order to make Holmes more likable,
Gillette asked Doyle if Holmes could get married at the play’s end. Doyle famously replied, “You may marry him or
murder him or do anything you like to him.”
Gillette would wind up playing Holmes for over 30 years.
The
Great Unattainable
Holmes is presented as a celibate borderline
misogynist in the writings of Doyle.
Holmes never courted, married and claimed that he had never been in
love. He had a low opinion of
women. He explains in The Sign of the Four (1890) that the
most winning woman he ever knew “was hanged for poisoning three little children
for their insurance money.” Doyle never
elaborated on this tantalizing memory. Doyle
wrote that Holmes only had his head turned by a woman once in “A Scandal in Bohemia.” Nothing ever came of it, except that Holmes
kept a photo of the woman locked in his desk.
Doyle was a master at dropping tantalizing hints about
Holmes without filling in the blanks. He left those blanks open for fans to
fill in with their own imaginations.
Women were able to fill in the blanks with whatever they fancied. Being able to turn the head of someone who
famously ignored women presents a thrilling challenge to the imagination. Unlike
real people, fictional characters have the virtue of never failing to live up
to your expectations. They are the great unattainable prize, where the victory is not so much in the getting but in the
hunt.
Image of William Gillette donated to Wikimedia Commons by Henry Zecher
No comments:
Post a Comment